5 Myths About App Automation Testing You Should Not Believe

Since the initial introduction of the Internet and application development, there have been massive changes that have completely changed this industry. For instance, modern apps can work on multiple devices at the same time while serving multiple purposes. For this process, the app developers need to create a complex infrastructure that requires thorough testing and evaluation. Some of the most important components of modern app development include the integration of automation testing and real device testing cloud. Both of these technologies help boost the quality and efficiency of the test cases by integrating real devices, comprehensive app evaluation, and thorough test report analysis.

However, while implementing app automation testing, the developers will come across several myths that can harm their application testing culture. So, with this article, we are going to explore some of the most common myths associated with app automation testing that you should not believe.

Understanding Test Automation

While testing modern apps, it would take several months if the developers relied on manually evaluating each element present on them. Instead, the developers use a pre-determined automation test script that can run the test cases by allowing the system to emulate human interactions while communicating with their application undergoing the development project. During the test script creation process, the app developers can implement the necessary changes to ensure that the test reports are customized according to the requirements of the app development project.

By integrating automation testing with the modern app testing cycle, the developers can utilize the following upsides:

  • Automation testing runs the test cases 24 hours round the clock even on non-business days. Therefore it is much more efficient compared to manual testing. Since automation testing is devoid of human involvement, it is not prone to errors.
  • As automation testing can run repetitive test cases like regression testing and data analysis testing, the developers and testers can focus on other creative areas of the app development project. For instance, they can come up with new features for future app updates.
  • Automation testing also has a role in improving the resource and time efficiency of the app development company. This is because by integrating test automation, the companies can eliminate their requirements of setting up and maintaining the human testing team.
  • While using Automation Testing, the app developers can also integrate additional tools, frameworks, and dependencies to improve the quality of the application that is undergoing the development project.
  • However, before proceeding with the integration of test automation, the developers must be aware of the steep initial charges that come with this process. This is because the app companies have to integrate various tools, plugins, and libraries that are critical for the proper execution of the automation test cases. This expense can be an issue for small companies or individual testers that do not have a stable flow of revenue.

Most Common App Automation Testing Myths

In the current automation testing industry, application testers will come across some of the most common myths that can drastically harm the testing experience if believed. So to help the new automation testers, we have busted some of the most common myths below:

  • Automation Testing is Completely Devoid of Human Involvement

Many developers and testers wrongly believe that automation testing does not require human involvement at any instance. It is wrong because even with complete automation, human intervention is required for the initial test case creation process, test maintenance, and periodic updates of the testing infrastructure. So the developers must remember that while automation testing can reduce the testing period compared to manual testing, it is not completely independent and requires human involvement to a certain extent. There are certain elements in applications that simply cannot be verified without the experience of human developers.

  • Automation testing is Faster than Manual Testing in every Scenario

The speed of automation testing is relatively dependent on the areas where the application developers are implementing these processes. This is because although automation testing is faster for repetitive and regressive test cases, it is completely slow and inaccurate when used for test cases like exploratory testing. Moreover, the initial setup process for automation testing is not only complex but also time-consuming. This is one of the primary reasons why the new automation testers have to go through an initial learning curve before beginning the testing process. This is also another reason why automation testing isn’t considered to be one of the best choices in all testing scenarios. So, modern test benches contain a perfect balance between manual and automated test cases.

  • It is Possible to Automate Every Test Case

Many new automation testers wrongly believe that they can implement this process on all elements and test cases involved in the application testing life cycle. This is because automation testing is only efficient when it is used for repetitive test cases that don’t involve many variations. On the other hand, when the app developers are working with test cases like usability testing and exploratory testing that include complex test scenarios they will require manual intervention. So, properly evaluating the areas that can benefit from automation testing will help avoid wasting precious company time and resources.

  • Using Automation Testing is an Expensive Process

indeed, the initial expense of automation testing and the test case creation process is quite high compared to other alternatives for app testing. However, the cost-effectiveness of automation testing lies in proper planning, efficient execution of the test cases, and long-term overview. So, we suggest the application developers have a proper testing plan before implementing automation testing. This plan will consist of all the required automation tools, tests that need to be automated, and a backup method to help remove the bugs. While creating this plan, the app developers should not only consider the development and testing teams but also the business and production teams to maintain an efficient knowledge about the current status of the project.

  • Automaton Testing is a Standalone Process

Many developers wrongly believe that automation testing is a standalone process and does not require the involvement of any other tools or plugins. This is wrong because there are various tools and frameworks easily available in the market that help integrate additional features for improving the efficiency of the test cases. For instance, the developers can integrate cloud platforms like LambdaTest to eliminate the hassle of setting up and maintaining a mobile device testing lab. With these platforms, the developers can achieve similar testing efficiency and quality by running the test cases on remote servers through the Internet. Some of the other benefits of cloud platform integration involve the elimination of Geolocation barriers and access to hundreds of legacy devices.

Using LambdaTest in Modern App Automation

LambdaTest is an AI-powered test orchestration and test execution platform that allows developers to initiate automated cross-browser testing on web apps. While using LambdaTest, app developers can also use artificial intelligence for creating and executing automation test cases. While using LambdaTest, the app developers can run the test cases on both real devices and emulators for increased testing efficiency and accuracy.

Let us now evaluate how the integration of LambdaTest helps improve modern app automation test cases:

  • LambdaTest, provides a real device testing cloud that consists of not only thousands of modern devices but also hundreds of legacy devices and older browser versions. This process has a crucial role in improving the overall app compatibility. The developers can access all of these devices through a remote server after purchasing the LambdaTest enterprise license.
  • While using LambdaTest for executing app automation testing, the developers can utilize parallel test execution to initiate and run multiple test instances using different configurations and machines at the same time.
  • While using LambdaTest for app automation testing, the developers can import the automation test cases from various well-known frameworks like Selenium, Appium, Cypress, and even Playwright. For reference, LambdaTest can run the Selenium test instances on more than 3,000 browser instances simultaneously.
  • LambdaTest also maintains a real-time activity log that keeps track of all the test instances including the failed ones. So, the app developers can use this information to avoid previously known errors in future app development projects.
  • LambdaTest also provides a dedicated method called the Lambda tunnel. Using this method, the application developers can use automation testing to verify the proper functioning of applications that have local host servers. Companies mainly use these apps for efficiency testing and other internal operations.
  • While using LambdaTest for app automation testing, the developers can also integrate other advanced processes like performance testing, end-to-end testing, automated regression testing, and data-driven testing. These test cases have a critical role in analyzing the performance of the application when it is subjected to various real-world parameters.
  • While using LambdaTest, the app developers can integrate the Selenium Grid to initiate automated cross-browser testing on web apps. This process verifies the stability of the app irrespective of changes in the operating system, browser version, or other device. We have mentioned a sample code for initiating automated cross-browser testing using the Selenium WebDriver on LambdaTest:
  • After running the test instances, LambdaTest will output a comprehensive test status report. This report is not only simple to understand but also visually appealing. For instance, the LambdaTest final report consists of various screenshots and videos that are automatically captured during the test execution process. The developers can use this information to quickly navigate to the faulty app element for the required debugging process.
  • The official website of LambdaTest also has elaborate documentation on various methods and commonly known errors. This website explains all these issues in simple language along with sample test cases. If the application developers are stuck with any feature, they can access support in the form of live chat, over-the-phone support, and even a mailing feature. The open-source community of LambdaTest allows automation developers and testers to discuss among themselves various issues.

The Conclusive Views

By busting some of the common myths in the segment of app automation testing, the developers can focus on improving the productivity of the testing environment and improving the application quality. By implementing these parameters, the developers will be able to create a positive image for their brand to maintain their position in this revolutionary yet competitive segment of the industry. It is also important to constantly keep an eye on the target audience’s requirements as it will help reach a wider section of end users. While choosing the app automation framework, the developer should consider both their preferences and project requirements. These are two of the most important factors that can have a decisive role in the efficiency of the overall testing environment.